Clarification Regarding H-2B Petitions Filed By Certain Associations

Posted on August 30th, 2009, by James Livesay in Immigration Law. Comments Off on Clarification Regarding H-2B Petitions Filed By Certain Associations

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued guidance clarifying for associations and their members certain regulatory requirements for filing petitions for H-2B classification on behalf of foreign workers. USCIS issued this clarification so that the public can be better informed of filing requirements and avoid unnecessary denials of individual petitions that may be otherwise approvable. USCIS has noticed a particular type of filing error in many H-2B petitions filed by certain associations on behalf of their members. Rather than file an individual petition with USCIS, some employers who are members of an association have sought H-2B non-agricultural workers via a “master” petition filed by their association.

A “master” petition is a petition that:

  • Is filed by an association (listing the association as petitioner) on behalf of several of its member-employers, and
  • Includes multiple temporary labor certifications which have been issued by the Department of Labor (DOL) for each individual member-employer, rather than a single temporary labor certification certified for the particular association itself as an employer or “joint employer.”

While USCIS recognizes that the facts of each case may be different, for the reasons discussed below, association member-employers generally should file a petition for H-2B classification directly and separately (listing themselves as the petitioner) with USCIS, rather than through a “master” petition filed by an association (listing the association as the petitioner) on behalf of several of its members. Petitions filed by associations that fail to meet the petitioner requirements for H-2B classification will be denied.

Discussion and Analysis

There are several reasons why H-2B petitions filed by associations on behalf of their employer members generally would not qualify for H-2B classification:

  • Labor certification. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(C) states that “the petitioner may not file an H-2B petition unless the United States petitioner has applied for a labor certification and with the Secretary of Labor…and has obtained a favorable labor certification determination…” Under DOL’s TEGL 21-06, associations are unable to obtain the required temporary labor certification on behalf of their members unless the association itself meets the definition of “employer” in 20 CFR 655.200(c). An H-2B petition filed on behalf of several association members and supported by several temporary labor certifications granted by DOL to each of the association’s members directly and separately would not meet the requirement of 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(C) and would therefore be subject to denial. In sum, this provision requires that the entity which obtained the temporary labor certification be the same entity filing the H-2B petition.
  • Multiple beneficiaries. Second, 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(ii) provides that more than one beneficiary may be included in an H-2B petition “if the beneficiaries will be performing the same service, or receiving the same training, for the same period of time, and in the same location.” An H-2B “master” petition filed by an association, in some cases, has included several labor certifications approved for several of its member employers. Since each temporary labor certification issued to a certain employer is certified for a specific job position in a specific location with a specific validity period, not all of the beneficiaries for whom the petition is filed will actually be performing the same services for the same period of time, and in the same location. In essence, by filing in such a way, the association, as the petitioner, is attempting to use a single petition for multiple employers, each of whom will be the sole employer of separate groups of beneficiaries. Even if an association would otherwise be eligible to file an H-2B petition under 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(C), the petition may be subject to denial, unless the association can demonstrate that the requirements of 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(ii) have been met with respect to each of the intended beneficiaries of the petition.Petitioner as Agent. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(A) states that, unless otherwise provided by regulation, the entity filing an H-2B petition must be the “United States employer” that seeks to classify the alien. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(F) provides a limited exception to this general requirement, by allowing an agent to file a petition:…in cases involving workers who are traditionally self-employed or workers who use agents to arrange short-term employment on their behalf with numerous employers, and in cases where a foreign employer authorizes the agent to act on its behalf.

In consideration of whether any association meets the requirements to file an H-2B petition as an agent, the burden is on the association, as the petitioner, to demonstrate that the type of workers sought in their petitions are either traditionally self-employed and/or that the alien beneficiaries of the petition use agents to arrange short-term employment on their behalf with numerous employers. Absent a showing in the H-2B petition that such workers meet either of these two criteria, a petition filed by an industry association would be subject to denial. Please note that cases involving “master” petitions adjudicated prior to this clarification that may have been inadvertently approved will not be subject to revocation, absent evidence of some other error, fraud or misrepresentation.

Contact Our Immigration Law Attorneys

If you or a loved one require assistance with an H-2B non-agricultural worker visa, or any other immigration law matter, contact us to schedule your initial consultation with an experienced immigration attorney today. Our immigration lawyers represent clients throughout Fairfax, Arlington, Alexandria, Manassas, Woodbridge and all of Northern Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia.

Share Button


Attorney James Livesay is a Partner at Livesay & Myers. After graduating from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1998, he began his legal career in the Navy JAG Corps, before entering private practice as a Virginia family lawyer in 2001. Along with partner Kevin Myers, Mr. Livesay founded Livesay & Myers in 2003. Today he advises the attorneys in each of the firm’s four offices.

Comments are closed.

Our Locations
Fairfax Office
3975 University Drive #325
Fairfax, VA 22030
Manassas Office
9408 Grant Avenue #402
Manassas, VA 20110
Leesburg Office
113 E Market St #110
Leesburg, VA 20176
Fredericksburg Office
303 Charlotte Street
Fredericksburg, VA 22401