Unenforceable Custody and Support Provisions in Separation Agreements


Posted on March 28th, 2017, by Ariel Baniowski in Custody, Divorce, Family Law. No Comments

Virginia CodeIt is not uncommon for people undergoing divorce to approach their attorneys with a laundry list of terms regarding their children that they would like included in their separation agreement, or for people who already divorced to approach attorneys with child-related terms of an existing separation agreement which they need enforced. What many people are surprised to hear is that some of those terms which they would like included, or some of the terms that may already be in their agreement, are actually unenforceable under Virginia law.

The first thing to understand in this area is that provisions in agreements regarding child custody, visitation and child support are always modifiable based upon a material change in circumstances. Always! So, any provision in an agreement which indefinitely prohibits the modification of custody, visitation or child support would be unenforceable.

Secondly, there are plenty of other provisions that we family law attorneys are commonly asked to include in separation agreements, or that we frequently see in agreements already in place, that are unenforceable. Here are just a few examples:

  • Waiving Future Child Support. A parent cannot contractually waive his or her right to seek future child support. Why? Because a child has a right to receive support and because parents have a duty to financially support their children. Further, if parties were able to contract away their obligation to financially support their children, the Commonwealth would face a crisis in regards to financial assistance to families. So, while parties can agree that based upon their current financial circumstances no child support will be payable at present, such an agreement can never be permanently binding.
  • Custody. Again, custody is always modifiable based upon a material change in circumstances. Common unenforceable provisions which we come across are those which try and prohibit the relocation of a custodial parent with the child. For example, a provision may read “In the event the mother [the primary physical custodian] moves more than 30 miles from the father’s current residence [the minority custodian], primary physical custody shall automatically transfer to the father.” A provision like that is unenforceable. Why? Because at the end of the day, the best interest of the child is the court’s paramount concern, and not the parties’ past promise to each other. A relocation of the child may actually be what is best for the child, despite the terms of the parties’ agreement.
  • Future Jurisdiction Over Custody and Visitation. Sorry, but you cannot contractually agree which state has indefinite jurisdiction over any custody or visitation issues which may arise in your case.

In addition to the above, parties undergoing a divorce will sometimes inquire as to whether a parent’s custodial rights can be terminated via separation agreement. The answer is no. Why? In Virginia, a parent cannot be relieved of their parental rights simply because they do not want to provide financial support to their child and/or do not want a relationship with the child and the other parent. As explained previously on this blog, the parental rights of a mother or father in Virginia can be terminated only if there is a third party willing to step into that parent’s role. To allow a parent’s rights and responsibilities to be terminated without a new parent “stepping into their shoes” (legally speaking), would dramatically increase the chance that the child would become an orphan or a ward of the state (i.e. a child to whom the Commonwealth is financially responsible).

Finally, things also get sticky when parties try to insert custody provisions into their agreement which involve third parties who are not parties to the contract. For example, a provision in a separation agreement may state that “In the event either of the parents of the children were to die, the surviving grandparents shall receive visitation with the children every other weekend.” Unfortunately, such a provision would be unenforceable. Why? One, because the grandparents are not parties to the contract and, therefore, cannot request its enforcement. Two, because, once again, the best interests of the children is the court’s paramount concern and will always trump any agreement between the parties—and such a provision would not necessarily be in the best interests of the children.

If you are involved in a custody, visitation or support dispute, be sure to consult with an experienced family law attorney as soon as possible. A well-informed party is a prepared party.

The family law attorneys at Livesay & Myers, P.C. represent parties in separation, divorce, custody, visitation and support matters across Northern Virginia. Contact us to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys in Leesburg, Fairfax, Fredericksburg or Manassas today.

Share Button

About 

Ariel Baniowski is a family law attorney in the Manassas office of Livesay & Myers. She is an aggressive advocate for those undergoing separation, divorce, or custody proceedings in Northern Virginia. Ms. Baniowski combines a tireless work ethic with years of experience in family law and a passion for helping people through difficult circumstances.



Comments

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Our Locations
Fairfax Office
3975 University Drive #325
Fairfax, VA 22030
703-865-4746
Manassas Office
9408 Grant Avenue #402
Manassas, VA 20110
571-208-1267
Leesburg Office
113 E Market St #110
Leesburg, VA 20176
571-291-3190
Fredericksburg Office
303 Charlotte Street
Fredericksburg, VA 22401
540-370-4140